Is It Problematic to Measure Only Phosphorylated Proteins Without Total Levels in WB Pathway Analysis?
Whether the omission of total protein detection poses a significant issue depends on the goals of the study and the design of the experiment. In general, the failure to assess both total protein levels and phosphorylation status can affect the accuracy and interpretability of the results in several important ways:
Baseline Protein Expression Levels
Quantifying total protein provides an essential internal control to establish the baseline expression of the target protein within the sample. Without this information, it becomes unclear whether observed changes in phosphorylation reflect actual shifts in post-translational modification or are merely the result of altered protein expression. For instance, an apparent increase in phosphorylation may simply arise from an overall increase in protein abundance rather than enhanced phosphorylation per se.
Quantitative Comparability Across Conditions
Measuring only phosphorylated forms without accounting for total protein limits the ability to quantitatively compare phosphorylation levels across different experimental conditions. Total protein normalization establishes a reference point for evaluating relative changes in phosphorylation, which is particularly critical in studies involving quantitative analysis or statistical comparison.
Control of Experimental Variability
Assessing total protein also serves as a technical control to monitor consistency across samples. If total protein levels are uniform, then differences in phosphorylation can be more confidently attributed to biological changes rather than technical artifacts. This contributes to the robustness and reproducibility of the observed findings.
MtoZ Biolabs, an integrated chromatography and mass spectrometry (MS) services provider.
Related Services
How to order?
