How Can the Lack of Significant Pathway Enrichment (p > 0.1) in Proteomic KEGG Analysis Be Resolved?
In KEGG enrichment analysis of proteomic data, when all p-values exceed 0.1, it suggests that no significantly enriched pathways have been identified within the analyzed protein set. This issue may arise due to several factors:
1. Insufficient Sample Size
A small sample size reduces statistical power, making it challenging to detect significant pathway enrichment.
2. Quality of the Protein List
The input protein list may be incomplete or biologically irrelevant.
3. Selection of the Background Gene Set
An inappropriate background gene set may lead to a lack of significant enrichment findings.
4. Biological Factors
Under specific biological conditions, there may genuinely be no significantly enriched pathways.
Potential Solutions
1. Increase Sample Size
Expanding the number of biological replicates (minimum 3–5) enhances the robustness of statistical analyses. Each replicate should maintain a protein concentration of 1–2 mg/mL to ensure data reliability.
2. Improve Data Quality
(1) Protein Extraction and Identification
①Utilize high-quality protein extraction buffers (e.g., RIPA buffer) to ensure sample purity.
②Quantify extracted proteins using the BCA protein assay kit to verify consistency across samples.
(2) Mass Spectrometry Optimization
①Employ high-resolution mass spectrometers such as the Q Exactive HF-X (Thermo Fisher) to improve data precision.
②Perform technical replicates (3–4 runs), injecting 1–2 µg per sample to maximize detection sensitivity.
Optimize Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
1. Selection of an Appropriate Background Database
Ensure that the reference database is up to date and species-specific.
(1) Recommended databases: UniProt and KEGG.
(2) Procedure: Download and apply the latest background database before conducting enrichment analysis.
2. Enhancing Statistical Sensitivity
Explore alternative statistical methods such as Fisher’s exact test or Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to improve pathway detection sensitivity.
(1) Recommended Tools: DAVID or GSEA software.
(2) Procedure: Import the protein list along with expression data and apply the most suitable statistical approach.
Adjust the Statistical Significance Threshold
In enrichment analysis software, modifying the p-value threshold from 0.1 to 0.05 may improve the detection of enriched pathways while maintaining statistical rigor.
Integrate Multi-Omics Data for Enhanced Interpretation
Combining proteomic data with complementary multi-omics datasets (e.g., RNA-Seq or metabolomics) may increase the likelihood of identifying biologically relevant pathways. Visualization and network analysis tools such as Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) and Cytoscape can facilitate the integration of multi-omics information, providing a comprehensive systems-level perspective.
By applying these strategies, researchers can improve the sensitivity and reliability of KEGG enrichment analysis in proteomics studies.
MtoZ Biolabs, an integrated chromatography and mass spectrometry (MS) services provider.
Related Services
How to order?
